08 June 2008
Supreme Court Building in DC new Hooters?
06/13/2008 07:43 Filed in: Politics
The political left has struck again. Justice Anthony
Kennedy gleefully read portions of the five justice
majority that essentially gives full U.S.
Constitutional rights to people who at one time were
shooting at your husbands, wives, sons and daughters
or plotting to fly airplanes into buildings.
For starters, this is a huge slap in the face to soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines who are still in country fighting. It should be noted that there is past case precedence for prisoners of war NOT having constitutional protection. Do a Google search for Johnson v. Eisentrager (339 U.S. 763). The court ruled that U.S. courts had no jurisdiction over German war criminals who were being held in U.S. managed prisons that were not on sovereign U.S. territory. Yes, this was basically thrown out in 2004 by Rasul v. Bush, but you should look at the difference in how the courts were stacked at the time.
The leftist courts better ask for more funding for parking lots. They'll be inundated with appeals and writs of habeas corpus (or habeus corpus). I propose that we just close the Supreme Court and turn the building into a Hooters. Then they won't have to privatize the Senate Dining Room due to the sub par quality of food. This will also give the Senators something to do in the off hours.
There will also be some serious modifications to the decision making process on the battlefield. Do you capture an enemy or take him out? There is a possibility he'll be back on the battlefield because our ignoramus Supreme Court thinks they have constitutional rights. Bye bye Osama.
For starters, this is a huge slap in the face to soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines who are still in country fighting. It should be noted that there is past case precedence for prisoners of war NOT having constitutional protection. Do a Google search for Johnson v. Eisentrager (339 U.S. 763). The court ruled that U.S. courts had no jurisdiction over German war criminals who were being held in U.S. managed prisons that were not on sovereign U.S. territory. Yes, this was basically thrown out in 2004 by Rasul v. Bush, but you should look at the difference in how the courts were stacked at the time.
The leftist courts better ask for more funding for parking lots. They'll be inundated with appeals and writs of habeas corpus (or habeus corpus). I propose that we just close the Supreme Court and turn the building into a Hooters. Then they won't have to privatize the Senate Dining Room due to the sub par quality of food. This will also give the Senators something to do in the off hours.
There will also be some serious modifications to the decision making process on the battlefield. Do you capture an enemy or take him out? There is a possibility he'll be back on the battlefield because our ignoramus Supreme Court thinks they have constitutional rights. Bye bye Osama.
Thanks, Apple
06/13/2008 07:36 Filed in: Apple
WWDC 2008 is history. Its funny, thinking back to
what was predicted and what Steve released. More
notebooks or improvements to the existing line? Nope.
GPS on the iPhone? Yup. More open sourcing on the
iPhone? Yup. Seeding 10.6 to developers? Ummmmm sort
of. They previewed the new platform in the afternoon
session after the keynote.
I couldn't be more happy vis-a-vis the improvements for the iPhone. One question, Steve. Why didn't you just delay the release of the iPhone and have all this stuff in v1? Hindsight is always 20/20 right?
I couldn't be more happy vis-a-vis the improvements for the iPhone. One question, Steve. Why didn't you just delay the release of the iPhone and have all this stuff in v1? Hindsight is always 20/20 right?